Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 7.3.
| Metric | Molmo2-8B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 7.3 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 4.4 | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 138 tok/s | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.41s | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | Free | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | Free | $12 |
| Context Window | N/A | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Molmo2-8B on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 7.3. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 4.4.
Molmo2-8B generates output significantly faster at 138 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 113 tok/s, making it 1.2x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.41s for Molmo2-8B vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Molmo2-8B is completely free, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input tokens and $12/1M output tokens.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 4.4), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Molmo2-8B is faster, producing output at 138 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 113 tok/s.
No, Molmo2-8B does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Molmo2-8B may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |