Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) vs GLM-5-Turbo: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) leads in intelligence with a score of 53.0 vs 46.8. For speed, Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) wins at 51 tok/s vs 0 tok/s.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Metric	Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)	GLM-5-Turbo
Intelligence Score	53.0	46.8
Coding Score	48.1	36.8
Math Score	N/A	N/A
Speed (tok/s)	51 tok/s	0 tok/s
Latency (TTFT)	12.63s	0.00s
Input Price / 1M tokens	$5.00	Free
Output Price / 1M tokens	$25	Free
Context Window

Detailed Analysis

Intelligence & Quality

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) outperforms GLM-5-Turbo on the intelligence index with a score of 53.0 compared to 46.8. For coding tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) has the edge with a coding score of 48.1 vs 36.8.

Speed & Latency

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) generates output significantly faster at 51 tok/s compared to GLM-5-Turbo's 0 tok/s, making it Infinityx faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.00s for GLM-5-Turbo vs 12.63s for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.

Pricing

GLM-5-Turbo is completely free, while Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) costs $5.00/1M input tokens and $25/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) when you need higher intelligence (53.0), stronger coding performance (48.1), faster output (51 tok/s).

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) if:

✓You need higher intelligence (score: 53.0 vs 46.8)
✓You prioritize coding performance (score: 48.1 vs 36.8)
✓You need faster throughput (51 tok/s vs 0 tok/s)

Choose GLM-5-Turbo if:

✓You want lower latency (0.00s vs 12.63s TTFT)
✓You want zero cost (Free vs paid)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) better than GLM-5-Turbo for coding?

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores higher on coding benchmarks (48.1 vs 36.8), making it the better choice for programming tasks.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) faster than GLM-5-Turbo?

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) is faster, producing output at 51 tok/s compared to GLM-5-Turbo's 0 tok/s.

Can Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) process images?

No, Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.

Should I use Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) or GLM-5-Turbo?

It depends on your priorities. Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores higher on intelligence (53.0), but GLM-5-Turbo may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.

Related Comparisons

claude opus 4 6 adaptive reasoning max effort vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview glm 5 turbo vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview claude opus 4 6 adaptive reasoning max effort vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)glm 5 turbo vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)glm 5 turbo vs GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)glm 5 turbo vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

View Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)details →View GLM-5-Turbodetails →Full pricing comparison →

Data last synced: March 26, 2026