Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 24, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

MiniMax: MiniMax M2 leads in intelligence with a score of 49.6 vs 46.5. MiniMax: MiniMax M2 is 58.8x cheaper at $0.26/1M tokens vs $15/1M.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricAnthropic: Claude Opus 4MiniMax: MiniMax M2
Intelligence Score46.549.6
Coding Score47.641.9
Math ScoreN/AN/A
Speed (tok/s)44 tok/s44 tok/s
Latency (TTFT)1.94s2.03s
Input Price / 1M tokens$15$0.26
Output Price / 1M tokens$75$1.00
Context Window200K197K
Max Output Tokens32K197K
Input ModalitiesImage + Text + FileText
Output ModalitiesTextText
Free TierNoNo

Detailed Analysis

Intelligence & Quality

MiniMax: MiniMax M2 outperforms Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index with a score of 49.6 compared to 46.5. For coding tasks, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 has the edge with a coding score of 47.6 vs 41.9.

Speed & Latency

Both models deliver similar output speeds: Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 at 44 tok/s and MiniMax: MiniMax M2 at 44 tok/s. Time to first token is 1.94s for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 vs 2.03s for MiniMax: MiniMax M2, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.

Pricing

MiniMax: MiniMax M2 is more affordable at $0.26/1M input tokens ($1.00/1M output), while Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 costs $15/1M input ($75/1M output). That makes Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 58.8x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 would cost approximately $90.00/month vs $1.53/month for MiniMax: MiniMax M2 in input costs alone.

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 offers a larger context window at 200K tokens compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 197K. For output length, MiniMax: MiniMax M2 can generate up to 197K tokens per response vs 32K for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.

Best Use Cases

Choose Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 when you need stronger coding performance (47.6). Choose MiniMax: MiniMax M2 when you need higher intelligence (49.6), lower cost.

Choose Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 if:

  • You prioritize coding performance (score: 47.6 vs 41.9)
  • You need image understanding (Supports image input)

Choose MiniMax: MiniMax M2 if:

  • You need higher intelligence (score: 49.6 vs 46.5)
  • Budget is a concern ($0.26/1M vs $15/1M)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 better than MiniMax: MiniMax M2 for coding?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks (47.6 vs 41.9), making it the better choice for programming tasks.

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?

MiniMax: MiniMax M2 is cheaper at $0.26/1M input tokens vs $15/1M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.

Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 faster than MiniMax: MiniMax M2?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 is faster, producing output at 44 tok/s compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 44 tok/s.

Can Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 process images?

Yes, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 supports image input. MiniMax: MiniMax M2 does not support image input.

Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 has a larger context window at 200K compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 197K.

Should I use Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?

It depends on your priorities. MiniMax: MiniMax M2 scores higher on intelligence (49.6), but Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.

Related Comparisons

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis

Data last synced: March 24, 2026