Updated March 25, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 53.0. OpenAI: GPT-5.4 is 6.0x cheaper at $2.50/1M tokens vs $15/1M. For speed, OpenAI: GPT-5.4 wins at 77 tok/s vs 48 tok/s.
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 53.0 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 48.1 | 57.3 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 48 tok/s | 77 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 11.42s | 147.35s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $2.50 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $75 | $15 |
| Context Window | 200K |
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 outperforms Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 53.0. For coding tasks, OpenAI: GPT-5.4 has the edge with a coding score of 57.3 vs 48.1.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 generates output significantly faster at 77 tok/s compared to Anthropic: Claude Opus 4's 48 tok/s, making it 1.6x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 11.42s for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 vs 147.35s for OpenAI: GPT-5.4, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 is more affordable at $2.50/1M input tokens ($15/1M output), while Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 costs $15/1M input ($75/1M output). That makes Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 6.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 would cost approximately $90.00/month vs $15.00/month for OpenAI: GPT-5.4 in input costs alone.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 offers a larger context window at 1.1M tokens compared to Anthropic: Claude Opus 4's 200K. This means OpenAI: GPT-5.4 can process roughly 525 pages of text in a single request vs 100 pages for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4. For output length, OpenAI: GPT-5.4 can generate up to 128K tokens per response vs 32K for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.
Choose OpenAI: GPT-5.4 when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (57.3), faster output (77 tok/s), lower cost, larger context window (1.1M).
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 scores higher on coding benchmarks (57.3 vs 48.1), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 is cheaper at $2.50/1M input tokens vs $15/1M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 is faster, producing output at 77 tok/s compared to Anthropic: Claude Opus 4's 48 tok/s.
Yes, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 supports image input. OpenAI: GPT-5.4 also supports images.
Data last synced: March 25, 2026
| 1.1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 32K | 128K |
| Input Modalities | Image + Text + File | Text + Image + File |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 has a larger context window at 1.1M compared to Anthropic: Claude Opus 4's 200K.
It depends on your priorities. OpenAI: GPT-5.4 scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.