Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 51.7. For speed, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins at 113 tok/s vs 71 tok/s.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 51.7 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 50.9 | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 71 tok/s | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 32.16s | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $12 |
| Context Window |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 51.7. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 50.9.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates output significantly faster at 113 tok/s compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)'s 71 tok/s, making it 1.6x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs 32.16s for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is more affordable at $2.00/1M input tokens ($12/1M output), while Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) costs $3.00/1M input ($15/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) would cost approximately $18.00/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5), faster output (113 tok/s).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 50.9), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00/1M input tokens vs $3.00/1M for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 113 tok/s compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)'s 71 tok/s.
No, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| N/A |
| 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.