Command-R+ (Apr '24) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 8.3. For speed, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins at 113 tok/s vs 0 tok/s.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Metric	Command-R+ (Apr '24)	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Intelligence Score	8.3	57.2
Coding Score	N/A	55.5
Math Score	N/A	N/A
Speed (tok/s)	0 tok/s	113 tok/s
Latency (TTFT)	0.00s	23.84s
Input Price / 1M tokens	$3.00	$2.00
Output Price / 1M tokens	$15	$12
Context Window	N/A	1.0M
Max Output Tokens	N/A	N/A
Input Modalities	Text	Audio + File + Image + Text + Video

Detailed Analysis

Intelligence & Quality

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Command-R+ (Apr '24) on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 8.3.

Speed & Latency

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates output significantly faster at 113 tok/s compared to Command-R+ (Apr '24)'s 0 tok/s, making it Infinityx faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.00s for Command-R+ (Apr '24) vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.

Pricing

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is more affordable at $2.00/1M input tokens ($12/1M output), while Command-R+ (Apr '24) costs $3.00/1M input ($15/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Command-R+ (Apr '24) would cost approximately $18.00/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), faster output (113 tok/s).

Choose Command-R+ (Apr '24) if:

✓You want lower latency (0.00s vs 23.84s TTFT)

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if:

✓You need higher intelligence (score: 57.2 vs 8.3)
✓You need faster throughput (113 tok/s vs 0 tok/s)
✓You need image understanding (Supports image input)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Command-R+ (Apr '24) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00/1M input tokens vs $3.00/1M for Command-R+ (Apr '24).

Is Command-R+ (Apr '24) faster than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 113 tok/s compared to Command-R+ (Apr '24)'s 0 tok/s.

Can Command-R+ (Apr '24) process images?

No, Command-R+ (Apr '24) does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.

Should I use Command-R+ (Apr '24) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Command-R+ (Apr '24) may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.

Related Comparisons

command r apr 24 vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)command r apr 24 vs GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

View Command-R+ (Apr '24)details →View Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewdetails →Full pricing comparison →

Data last synced: March 26, 2026