Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 7.0x cheaper at $0.25/1M tokens vs $1.75/1M.
| Metric | Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) | GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | N/A | 54.0 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 53.1 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | N/A | 72 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | N/A | 83.91s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.25 | $1.75 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $1.50 | $14 |
| Context Window | 66K | N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | 66K | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Image + Text | Text |
| Output Modalities |
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is more affordable at $0.25/1M input tokens ($1.50/1M output), while GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) costs $1.75/1M input ($14/1M output). That makes GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) 7.0x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) would cost approximately $1.50/month vs $10.50/month for GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) in input costs alone.
Choose Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) when you need lower cost.
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is cheaper at $0.25/1M input tokens vs $1.75/1M for GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh).
Yes, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) supports image input. GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) does not support image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Image + Text |
| Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |