Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 24, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 49.6. MiniMax: MiniMax M2 is 7.8x cheaper at $0.26/1M tokens vs $2.00/1M. For speed, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins at 117 tok/s vs 44 tok/s.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax: MiniMax M2
Intelligence Score57.249.6
Coding Score55.541.9
Math ScoreN/AN/A
Speed (tok/s)117 tok/s44 tok/s
Latency (TTFT)21.91s2.03s
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.00$0.26
Output Price / 1M tokens$12$1.00
Context Window1.0M197K
Max Output Tokens66K197K
Input ModalitiesAudio + File + Image + Text + VideoText
Output ModalitiesTextText
Free TierNoNo

Detailed Analysis

Intelligence & Quality

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms MiniMax: MiniMax M2 on the Artificial Analysis intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 49.6. For coding tasks, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 41.9.

Speed & Latency

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates output significantly faster at 117 tok/s compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 44 tok/s, making it 2.7x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 2.03s for MiniMax: MiniMax M2 vs 21.91s for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.

Pricing

MiniMax: MiniMax M2 is more affordable at $0.26/1M input tokens ($1.00/1M output), while Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). That makes Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 7.8x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview would cost approximately $12.00/month vs $1.53/month for MiniMax: MiniMax M2 in input costs alone.

Context Window

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers a larger context window at 1.0M tokens compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 197K. This means Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview can process roughly 524 pages of text in a single request vs 98 pages for MiniMax: MiniMax M2. For output length, MiniMax: MiniMax M2 can generate up to 197K tokens per response vs 66K for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Best Use Cases

Choose Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5), faster output (117 tok/s), larger context window (1.0M). Choose MiniMax: MiniMax M2 when you need lower cost.

Choose Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if:

  • You need higher intelligence (score: 57.2 vs 49.6)
  • You prioritize coding performance (score: 55.5 vs 41.9)
  • You need faster throughput (117 tok/s vs 44 tok/s)
  • You need a larger context window (1.0M vs 197K)
  • You need image understanding (Supports image input)

Choose MiniMax: MiniMax M2 if:

  • You want lower latency (2.03s vs 21.91s TTFT)
  • Budget is a concern ($0.26/1M vs $2.00/1M)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than MiniMax: MiniMax M2 for coding?

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 41.9), making it the better choice for programming tasks.

Which is cheaper, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?

MiniMax: MiniMax M2 is cheaper at $0.26/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Is Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview faster than MiniMax: MiniMax M2?

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 117 tok/s compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 44 tok/s.

Can Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview process images?

Yes, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports image input. MiniMax: MiniMax M2 does not support image input.

Which has a larger context window, Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a larger context window at 1.0M compared to MiniMax: MiniMax M2's 197K.

Should I use Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiniMax: MiniMax M2?

It depends on your priorities. Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but MiniMax: MiniMax M2 may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.

Related Comparisons

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis

Data last synced: March 24, 2026