Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 23.9.
| Metric | LongCat Flash Lite | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 23.9 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 16.5 | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 125 tok/s | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 3.04s | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | Free | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | Free | $12 |
| Context Window | N/A | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms LongCat Flash Lite on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 23.9. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 16.5.
Both models deliver similar output speeds: LongCat Flash Lite at 125 tok/s and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 113 tok/s. Time to first token is 3.04s for LongCat Flash Lite vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
LongCat Flash Lite is completely free, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input tokens and $12/1M output tokens.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 16.5), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
LongCat Flash Lite is faster, producing output at 125 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 113 tok/s.
No, LongCat Flash Lite does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but LongCat Flash Lite may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |