Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Both MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview are competitive AI models. See the detailed comparison below to find which best fits your needs.
| Metric | MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | N/A | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | N/A | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | N/A | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $12 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text + Image | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
| Output Modalities |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is more affordable at $2.00/1M input tokens ($12/1M output), while MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 costs $3.00/1M input ($15/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 would cost approximately $18.00/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Both models support the same context window of 1.0M tokens (approximately 524 pages of text).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00/1M input tokens vs $3.00/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.
Yes, MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 supports image input. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview also supports images.
Both models have the same context window of 1.0M tokens.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Text |
| Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |