Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 18.5. For speed, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins at 113 tok/s vs 0 tok/s.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Metric	Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning)	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Intelligence Score	18.5	57.2
Coding Score	9.4	55.5
Math Score	54.7	N/A
Speed (tok/s)	0 tok/s	113 tok/s
Latency (TTFT)	0.00s	23.84s
Input Price / 1M tokens	Free	$2.00
Output Price / 1M tokens	Free	$12
Context Window

Detailed Analysis

Intelligence & Quality

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 18.5. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 9.4.

Speed & Latency

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates output significantly faster at 113 tok/s compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning)'s 0 tok/s, making it Infinityx faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.00s for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.

Pricing

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) is completely free, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input tokens and $12/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5), faster output (113 tok/s).

Choose Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) if:

✓You want lower latency (0.00s vs 23.84s TTFT)
✓You want zero cost (Free vs paid)

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if:

✓You need higher intelligence (score: 57.2 vs 18.5)
✓You prioritize coding performance (score: 55.5 vs 9.4)
✓You need faster throughput (113 tok/s vs 0 tok/s)
✓You need image understanding (Supports image input)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 9.4), making it the better choice for programming tasks.

Is Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) faster than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is faster, producing output at 113 tok/s compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning)'s 0 tok/s.

Can Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) process images?

No, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.

Should I use Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.

Related Comparisons

llama 3 3 nemotron super 49b v1 reasoning vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)llama 3 3 nemotron super 49b v1 reasoning vs GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

View Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning)details →View Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewdetails →Full pricing comparison →

Data last synced: March 26, 2026