Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
GPT-5.2 (xhigh) leads in intelligence with a score of 51.3 vs 46.4. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) is 3.5x cheaper at $0.50/1M tokens vs $1.75/1M. For speed, Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) wins at 192 tok/s vs 70 tok/s.
| Metric | GPT-5.2 (xhigh) | Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 51.3 | 46.4 |
| Coding Score | 48.7 | 42.6 |
| Math Score | 99.0 | 97.0 |
| Speed (tok/s) | 70 tok/s | 192 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 75.24s | 6.11s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $1.75 | $0.50 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $14 | $3.00 |
| Context Window |
GPT-5.2 (xhigh) outperforms Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) on the intelligence index with a score of 51.3 compared to 46.4. For coding tasks, GPT-5.2 (xhigh) has the edge with a coding score of 48.7 vs 42.6. In mathematical reasoning, GPT-5.2 (xhigh) leads with 99.0 compared to Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)'s 97.0.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) generates output significantly faster at 192 tok/s compared to GPT-5.2 (xhigh)'s 70 tok/s, making it 2.8x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 6.11s for Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) vs 75.24s for GPT-5.2 (xhigh), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) is more affordable at $0.50/1M input tokens ($3.00/1M output), while GPT-5.2 (xhigh) costs $1.75/1M input ($14/1M output). That makes GPT-5.2 (xhigh) 3.5x more expensive per token, which can add up significantly at scale. For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, GPT-5.2 (xhigh) would cost approximately $10.50/month vs $3.00/month for Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) in input costs alone.
Choose GPT-5.2 (xhigh) when you need higher intelligence (51.3), stronger coding performance (48.7). Choose Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) when you need faster output (192 tok/s), lower cost.
GPT-5.2 (xhigh) scores higher on coding benchmarks (48.7 vs 42.6), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) is cheaper at $0.50/1M input tokens vs $1.75/1M for GPT-5.2 (xhigh).
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) is faster, producing output at 192 tok/s compared to GPT-5.2 (xhigh)'s 70 tok/s.
No, GPT-5.2 (xhigh) does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| N/A |
| N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. GPT-5.2 (xhigh) scores higher on intelligence (51.3), but Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.