Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Both Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max and GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) are competitive AI models. See the detailed comparison below to find which best fits your needs.
| Metric | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max | GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | N/A | 54.0 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 53.1 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | N/A | 72 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | N/A | 83.91s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $1.75 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $6.00 | $14 |
| Context Window | 1M | N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | 131K | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text + Image + Video | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) is more affordable at $1.75/1M input tokens ($14/1M output), while Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max costs $2.00/1M input ($6.00/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max would cost approximately $12.00/month vs $10.50/month for GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) in input costs alone.
GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) is cheaper at $1.75/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max.
Yes, Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max supports image input. GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) does not support image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026