Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 25.2.
| Metric | Grok 3 | GPT-5.4 (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 25.2 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 19.8 | 57.3 |
| Math Score | 58.0 | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 69 tok/s | 77 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.33s | 181.82s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $2.50 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $15 | $15 |
| Context Window | 131K | N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) outperforms Grok 3 on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 25.2. For coding tasks, GPT-5.4 (xhigh) has the edge with a coding score of 57.3 vs 19.8.
Both models deliver similar output speeds: Grok 3 at 69 tok/s and GPT-5.4 (xhigh) at 77 tok/s. Time to first token is 0.33s for Grok 3 vs 181.82s for GPT-5.4 (xhigh), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is more affordable at $2.50/1M input tokens ($15/1M output), while Grok 3 costs $3.00/1M input ($15/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Grok 3 would cost approximately $18.00/month vs $15.00/month for GPT-5.4 (xhigh) in input costs alone.
Choose GPT-5.4 (xhigh) when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (57.3).
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores higher on coding benchmarks (57.3 vs 19.8), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is cheaper at $2.50/1M input tokens vs $3.00/1M for Grok 3.
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) is faster, producing output at 77 tok/s compared to Grok 3's 69 tok/s.
No, Grok 3 does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Output Modalities |
| Text |
| Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
It depends on your priorities. GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Grok 3 may be better for specific use cases like budget-conscious projects or speed-critical applications.