Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 2.0x cheaper at $1.00/1M tokens vs $2.00/1M.
| Metric | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | N/A | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | N/A | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | N/A | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $12 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 16K | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
| Output Modalities |
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro is more affordable at $1.00/1M input tokens ($3.00/1M output), while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input ($12/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro would cost approximately $6.00/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Both models support the same context window of 1.0M tokens (approximately 524 pages of text).
Choose Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro when you need lower cost.
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $1.00/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
No, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.
Both models have the same context window of 1.0M tokens.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Text |
| Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |