Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 is 1.8x cheaper at $0.95/1M tokens vs $1.75/1M.
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 5.2 | GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | N/A | 54.0 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 53.1 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | N/A | 72 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | N/A | 83.91s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.95 | $1.75 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $14 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | 33K | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 is more affordable at $0.95/1M input tokens ($3.00/1M output), while GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) costs $1.75/1M input ($14/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 would cost approximately $5.70/month vs $10.50/month for GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) in input costs alone.
Choose Z.ai: GLM 5.2 when you need lower cost.
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 is cheaper at $0.95/1M input tokens vs $1.75/1M for GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh).
No, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026