GLM-5-Turbo vs Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort): Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) leads in intelligence with a score of 53.0 vs 46.8. For speed, Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) wins at 51 tok/s vs 0 tok/s.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Metric	GLM-5-Turbo	Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Intelligence Score	46.8	53.0
Coding Score	36.8	48.1
Math Score	N/A	N/A
Speed (tok/s)	0 tok/s	51 tok/s
Latency (TTFT)	0.00s	12.63s
Input Price / 1M tokens	Free	$5.00
Output Price / 1M tokens	Free	$25
Context Window

Detailed Analysis

Intelligence & Quality

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) outperforms GLM-5-Turbo on the intelligence index with a score of 53.0 compared to 46.8. For coding tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) has the edge with a coding score of 48.1 vs 36.8.

Speed & Latency

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) generates output significantly faster at 51 tok/s compared to GLM-5-Turbo's 0 tok/s, making it Infinityx faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.00s for GLM-5-Turbo vs 12.63s for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.

Pricing

GLM-5-Turbo is completely free, while Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) costs $5.00/1M input tokens and $25/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) when you need higher intelligence (53.0), stronger coding performance (48.1), faster output (51 tok/s).

Choose GLM-5-Turbo if:

✓You want lower latency (0.00s vs 12.63s TTFT)
✓You want zero cost (Free vs paid)

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) if:

✓You need higher intelligence (score: 53.0 vs 46.8)
✓You prioritize coding performance (score: 48.1 vs 36.8)
✓You need faster throughput (51 tok/s vs 0 tok/s)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GLM-5-Turbo better than Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) for coding?

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores higher on coding benchmarks (48.1 vs 36.8), making it the better choice for programming tasks.

Is GLM-5-Turbo faster than Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)?

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) is faster, producing output at 51 tok/s compared to GLM-5-Turbo's 0 tok/s.

Can GLM-5-Turbo process images?

No, GLM-5-Turbo does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.

Should I use GLM-5-Turbo or Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)?

It depends on your priorities. Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores higher on intelligence (53.0), but GLM-5-Turbo may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.

Related Comparisons

glm 5 turbo vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview claude opus 4 6 adaptive reasoning max effort vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview glm 5 turbo vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)claude opus 4 6 adaptive reasoning max effort vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)claude opus 4 6 adaptive reasoning max effort vs GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)claude opus 4 6 adaptive reasoning max effort vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

View GLM-5-Turbodetails →View Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)details →Full pricing comparison →

Data last synced: March 26, 2026