Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
Both Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview are competitive AI models. See the detailed comparison below to find which best fits your needs.
| Metric | Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | N/A | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | N/A | 55.5 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | N/A | 113 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | N/A | 23.84s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $10 | $12 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 128K | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text + Image + File | Audio + File + Image + Text + Video |
| Output Modalities |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is more affordable at $2.00/1M input tokens ($12/1M output), while Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest costs $2.00/1M input ($10/1M output). For a typical workload of 100 requests per day at 2,000 tokens each, Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest would cost approximately $12.00/month vs $12.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in input costs alone.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview offers a larger context window at 1.0M tokens compared to Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest's 1M.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00/1M input tokens vs $2.00/1M for Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest.
Yes, Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest supports image input. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview also supports images.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a larger context window at 1.0M compared to Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latest's 1M.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Text |
| Text |
| Free Tier | No | No |