Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
MiniMax-M2.7 leads in intelligence with a score of 49.6 vs 46.8. For speed, MiniMax-M2.7 wins at 45 tok/s vs 0 tok/s.
| Metric | MiniMax-M2.7 | GLM-5-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 49.6 | 46.8 |
| Coding Score | 41.9 | 36.8 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 45 tok/s | 0 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 1.78s | 0.00s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | $0.30 | Free |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | $1.20 | Free |
| Context Window | N/A | N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
MiniMax-M2.7 outperforms GLM-5-Turbo on the intelligence index with a score of 49.6 compared to 46.8. For coding tasks, MiniMax-M2.7 has the edge with a coding score of 41.9 vs 36.8.
MiniMax-M2.7 generates output significantly faster at 45 tok/s compared to GLM-5-Turbo's 0 tok/s, making it Infinityx faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 0.00s for GLM-5-Turbo vs 1.78s for MiniMax-M2.7, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
GLM-5-Turbo is completely free, while MiniMax-M2.7 costs $0.30/1M input tokens and $1.20/1M output tokens.
Choose MiniMax-M2.7 when you need higher intelligence (49.6), stronger coding performance (41.9), faster output (45 tok/s).
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks (41.9 vs 36.8), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
MiniMax-M2.7 is faster, producing output at 45 tok/s compared to GLM-5-Turbo's 0 tok/s.
No, MiniMax-M2.7 does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
It depends on your priorities. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on intelligence (49.6), but GLM-5-Turbo may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |