Sarvam 30B (high) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Which AI Model Is Better?

Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data

Quick Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 12.3. For speed, Sarvam 30B (high) wins at 206 tok/s vs 113 tok/s.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Metric	Sarvam 30B (high)	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Intelligence Score	12.3	57.2
Coding Score	7.9	55.5
Math Score	N/A	N/A
Speed (tok/s)	206 tok/s	113 tok/s
Latency (TTFT)	1.35s	23.84s
Input Price / 1M tokens	Free	$2.00
Output Price / 1M tokens	Free	$12
Context Window	N/A	1.0M
Max Output Tokens	N/A	N/A
Input Modalities	Text	Audio + File + Image + Text + Video

Detailed Analysis

Intelligence & Quality

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview outperforms Sarvam 30B (high) on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 12.3. For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge with a coding score of 55.5 vs 7.9.

Speed & Latency

Sarvam 30B (high) generates output significantly faster at 206 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 113 tok/s, making it 1.8x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 1.35s for Sarvam 30B (high) vs 23.84s for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.

Pricing

Sarvam 30B (high) is completely free, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00/1M input tokens and $12/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Sarvam 30B (high) when you need faster output (206 tok/s). Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (55.5).

Choose Sarvam 30B (high) if:

✓You need faster throughput (206 tok/s vs 113 tok/s)
✓You want lower latency (1.35s vs 23.84s TTFT)
✓You want zero cost (Free vs paid)

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if:

✓You need higher intelligence (score: 57.2 vs 12.3)
✓You prioritize coding performance (score: 55.5 vs 7.9)
✓You need image understanding (Supports image input)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sarvam 30B (high) better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks (55.5 vs 7.9), making it the better choice for programming tasks.

Is Sarvam 30B (high) faster than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Sarvam 30B (high) is faster, producing output at 206 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 113 tok/s.

Can Sarvam 30B (high) process images?

No, Sarvam 30B (high) does not support image input. However, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does support images.

Should I use Sarvam 30B (high) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

It depends on your priorities. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Sarvam 30B (high) may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.

Related Comparisons

sarvam 30b high vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs GPT-5.4 (xhigh)sarvam 30b high vs GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)gemini 3 1 pro preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

View Sarvam 30B (high)details →View Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewdetails →Full pricing comparison →

Data last synced: March 26, 2026