Updated March 26, 2026· Based on independent benchmark data
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) leads in intelligence with a score of 57.2 vs 12.3. For speed, Sarvam 30B (high) wins at 206 tok/s vs 77 tok/s.
| Metric | Sarvam 30B (high) | GPT-5.4 (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Score | 12.3 | 57.2 |
| Coding Score | 7.9 | 57.3 |
| Math Score | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tok/s) | 206 tok/s | 77 tok/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 1.35s | 181.82s |
| Input Price / 1M tokens | Free | $2.50 |
| Output Price / 1M tokens | Free | $15 |
| Context Window | N/A | N/A |
| Max Output Tokens | N/A | N/A |
| Input Modalities | Text | Text |
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) outperforms Sarvam 30B (high) on the intelligence index with a score of 57.2 compared to 12.3. For coding tasks, GPT-5.4 (xhigh) has the edge with a coding score of 57.3 vs 7.9.
Sarvam 30B (high) generates output significantly faster at 206 tok/s compared to GPT-5.4 (xhigh)'s 77 tok/s, making it 2.7x faster for streaming responses. Time to first token is 1.35s for Sarvam 30B (high) vs 181.82s for GPT-5.4 (xhigh), which affects perceived responsiveness in interactive applications.
Sarvam 30B (high) is completely free, while GPT-5.4 (xhigh) costs $2.50/1M input tokens and $15/1M output tokens.
Choose Sarvam 30B (high) when you need faster output (206 tok/s). Choose GPT-5.4 (xhigh) when you need higher intelligence (57.2), stronger coding performance (57.3).
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores higher on coding benchmarks (57.3 vs 7.9), making it the better choice for programming tasks.
Sarvam 30B (high) is faster, producing output at 206 tok/s compared to GPT-5.4 (xhigh)'s 77 tok/s.
No, Sarvam 30B (high) does not support image input. Neither model supports image input.
It depends on your priorities. GPT-5.4 (xhigh) scores higher on intelligence (57.2), but Sarvam 30B (high) may be better for specific use cases like cost savings or speed-critical applications.
Data last synced: March 26, 2026
| Output Modalities | Text | Text |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |